NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 5: Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data

NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 5: Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data

ANALYSIS OF QUANTITATIVE DATA

In order to provide meaningful results, research processes must be carefully selected and appropriate for the data being analyzed. Statistical programs such as SPSS are frequently utilized by researchers to conduct the analysis of large data sets. These data are organized to provide meaningful interpretation and often include descriptive statistics. Qualitative analysis is completed using content analysis, looking for patterns and themes that emerge from the data. Individual experiences described in interviews and focus groups are considered data and are often provided as examples to support the results in the study publication. Whether you will engage in either quantitative or qualitative research, it is likely that you will encounter both types of studies in the literature. As a nursing professional, being able to analyze and interpret both types of research designs will be important to affect nursing practice that promotes positive health outcomes in
quality of care and patient safety.

For Assignment 1, you will conduct descriptive statistical analyses using quantitative data. For Assignment 2, you will conduct content coding to analyze qualitative data. Please review the Instructions: Quantitative Analysis Assignment and Instructions: Content Coding of Challenges of Staying in the Hospital in this week’s resources to review how to complete both parts of this Assignment. Note: Assignments 1 and 2 will not be accepted unless the required templates are used.

NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT 1: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES

  • Follow the step-by-step instructions provided in the Instructions: Quantitative Analysis Assignment document in this week’s resources on using the Excel program to conduct descriptive analyses of quantitative data.
  • The Quantitative Data Excel Assignment spreadsheet that you will need is in the resources for this week.
  • For this Assignment, you will need to describe the findings from your analyses and summarize what they tell you about these patients and the extent of the adverse events they experienced during their hospitalization. What additional information would you need to help develop a plan to decrease the occurrence of these events?  Use the Summary Data Analysis Form in this week’s resources to complete your analysis.

 

ORDER AN ORIGINAL ASSIGNMENT FROM US

Also Read Previous Weeks :

Get a custom written, paper or essay just for you in as little as 3hrs.

Our Qualified A++ writers are always online to assist you.

Order Now

NURS 3150 Week 5 Assignment 1 Rubric

NURS_3150_Week_5_Assignment_1_Rubric
NURS_3150_Week_5_Assignment_1_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Completes accurate analysis of: mean age, percentage of patients fallen, percentage of patients reported catheter-associated urinary tract infections, percentage of patients reported medication errors, percentage of patients reported methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections when first admitted. 5 points for each analysis.

25 to >20.0 pts

Excellent
Provides 5 accurate analyses.

20 to >15.0 pts

Proficient
Provides 4 accurate analyses.

15 to >10.0 pts

Basic
Provides 3 accurate analyses.

10 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Provides 2 or less accurate analyses.
25 pts

Summarizes findings of the analyses of patient safety events. Discusses possible additional information needed to decrease the occurrence of adverse patient safety events.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed summary of patient safety events and included possible additional information needed to decrease the occurrence of patient safety events.

40 to >35.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed summary of patient safety events and included some possible additional information needed to decrease the occurrence of patient safety events.

35 to >31.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed summary of patient safety events with limited possible additional information needed to decrease the occurrence of patient safety events.

31 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under- developed summary of patient safety events with very limited or no discussion of possible additional information needed to decrease the occurrence of patient safety events.
45 pts

Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient
Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.

7 to >6.0 pts

Basic
Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.
10 pts

Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

7 to >6.0 pts

Basic
Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.
10 pts

APA Attribution and Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1″ margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting with no errors using the template provided.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient
Demonstrates developed APA formatting with few formatting errors using the template provided.

7 to >6.0 pts

Basic
Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting with several formatting errors using the template provided.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Demonstrates limited APA formatting with multiple formatting errors or fails to use the template provided.
10 pts
Total Points: 100

ANALYSIS OF QUALITATIVE DATA

For Assignment 2, you will conduct content coding to analyze qualitative data. Please review the Instructions: Quantitative Analysis Assignment and Instructions: Content Coding of Challenges of Staying in the Hospital in this week’s resources to review how to complete both parts of this Assignment. Note: Assignments 1 and 2 will not be accepted unless the required templates are used.

 

ORDER AN ORIGINAL ASSIGNMENT FROM US

 

NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT 2: QUALITATIVE ANALYSES

  • Follow the step-by-step instructions provided in the Instructions: Qualitative Coding  document in this week’s resources. The document provides detailed instructions on the step-by-step process of conducting the content analysis for this part of the Assignment.
  • Access the Challenges of Staying in the Hospital Data document located in this week’s resources that includes the narrative descriptions of 10 students about their challenges in a recent hospital stay.
    • The analytic method you will use to analyze the narrative data for this Assignment is called content analysis. It requires you to read each patient’s narrative and then code its content using thematic categories on a coding sheet.
  • Access the Code Sheet document located in this week’s resources to carry out the coding as defined in the instructions.
    • For the written part of this assignment, you will need to describe the most common types of challenges that students had while staying in the hospital.

NURS 3150 Week 5 Assignment 2 Rubric

NURS_3150_Week_5_Assignment_2_Rubric
NURS_3150_Week_5_Assignment_2_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Correctly codes 20+ challenges for 10 students.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent
Correctly codes 9-10 challenges.

17 to >15.0 pts

Proficient
Correctly codes 8 challenges.

15 to >13.0 pts

Basic
Correctly codes 7 challenges.

13 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Correctly codes 6 or fewer challenges.
20 pts

Summarizes the major themes or most common challenges.

50 to >44.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed summary of the major themes or most common challenges with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

44 to >39.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed summary of the major themes or most common challenges with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.

39 to >34.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed summary of the major themes or most common challenges with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.

34 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed summary of the major themes or most common challenges with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
50 pts

Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient
Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.

7 to >6.0 pts

Basic
Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.
10 pts

Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

7 to >6.0 pts

Basic
Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.
10 pts

APA Attributions and Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1″ margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting with no errors using the template provided.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient
Demonstrates developed APA formatting with few formatting errors using the template provided.

7 to >6.0 pts

Basic
Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting with several formatting errors using the template provided.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Demonstrates limited APA formatting with multiple formatting errors or fails to use the template provided.
10 pts
Total Points: 100

LEARNING RESOURCES

  • Gray, J. R, & Grove, S. K. (2021). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.
    • Chapter 21, “Introduction to Statistical Analysis” (pp. 635–650)
    • Chapter 22, “Using Statistics to Describe Variables” (pp. 652–662)
    • Chapter 12, “Qualitative Research Methodology”
      • “Qualitative Data Analysis” (pp. 350–352)

Also read related assignments:

  1. NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 3: Quantitative Research Designs and Methods
  2. NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 4: Qualitative Research Designs and Methods
  3. NURS 3100 WEEK 6: ISSUES / TRENDS IN NURSING
  4. NURS 3100 Week 4 Discussion , Assignments and Essays

Do you Need a nursing assignment, paper or essay help ?

Get an plagiarism free paper on NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 5: Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data or any other topic and enjoy top notch delivery with pocket friendly prices

Order a paper

Tags