NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 3: Quantitative Research Designs and Methods

NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 3: AT A GLANCE

QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS

INTRODUCTION

Andre is a nursing student who has just completed the first 2 weeks in a nursing research course. He has defined a clinical research question for his health care setting and has also determined that the research problem exists in the literature. However, his approach to defining a solution for his research question requires that he receive approval from his health care setting before testing it.

However, Andre is not quite sure what he needs to do next. Eager to start, Andre jumps ahead in the course syllabus and sees that in the following weeks he will read about quantitative research design and methods. Slightly confused, he is not quite sure what is meant by quantitative research design and methods and begins drafting an email message to his instructor to see if he might be able to use this information for testing his research question in practice.

What is quantitative research design? What different methods might exist for engaging in quantitative research for nursing practice?

As you have explored in this course, your next step in the research process is to determine what type of research design and methods you will use to engage in research for your research question. While it is possible that many research designs and methods might be appropriate for your particular research question, gaining a firm understanding of different research designs and methods is another useful skill for engaging in nursing research and practice.

Get a custom written, paper or essay just for you in as little as 3hrs.

Our Qualified A++ writers are always online to assist you.

This week, you explore the different categories of quantitative research designs used in a clinical research studies. These include experimental, quasi-experimental, descriptive and correlational designs. You will examine the basic characteristics of each design (e.g., causality, control, bias, validity, randomization, probability). You will also examine the basic features of the methods used to conduct most quantitative research designs, such as sample selection, data collection and measurement of variables, as well as data management and analyses.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Students will:

  • Demonstrate an understanding of the basic characteristics of quantitative research designs
  • Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of methods used in quantitative research designs

 

Also Read Week 2 : NURS 3150 / 3151 Week 2: Conducting a Literature Search on a Clinical Research Question

NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION:

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Selection of the appropriate sample is critical to the reliability and validity of research methodology. The sample must be representative of the population that is being studied. Researchers often report both the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the sample. There are many different methods for selecting a sample and random sampling provides the high control of outside variables but is often difficult to utilize in many studies.

For this Discussion, please review the following:

  • For this assignment, read the article by Zaccari, Callahan, Storzback, & McFarlane (2020), listed in the resource section for this week.

BY DAY 3

Prepare at least a 350-word post discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study and if the sampling method promoted reliable and valid results. Include in the discussion if there is anything the researcher could have done to improve the sampling process.

Note: Post a 3-paragraph (at least 350 words) response. Be sure to use evidence,in-text citations, and essay-level writing skills, including the use of transitional materialand organizational frames. Use the writing resources and the Discussion Rubric to develop your post.

BY DAY 7

Read two or more of your colleagues’ postings from the Discussion question.

Respond to two or more of your colleagues with a comment that asks for clarification, provides support for, or contributes additional information.

Post a Discussion entry on 3 different days of the week. See the Discussion Rubrics for more information.

 

Rubric

NURS_3150_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_3150_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Research Design

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed explanation of the research design with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed discussion of the research design with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed discussion of the research design with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed discussion of the research design with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
15 pts

Sample Selection

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
15 pts

Data Collection Methods, Measures, & Tools

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed explanation of the data collection methods, measures, and tools with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed explanation of the data collection methods, measures, and tools with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the data collection methods, measures, and tools with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under- developed explanation of the data collection methods, measures, and tools with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
15 pts

Plan for Data Analysis

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
15 pts

Identifies and describes the strengths and weaknesses of the research method used. Include at least 2 strengths and two weakness based on reliability and validity.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the reliability and validity and supported with a citation for each with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

22 to >19.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the reliability and validity and supported with a citation for each with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

19 to >17.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the reliability and validity and supported with a citation for each with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

17 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the reliability and validity and supported with a citation for each with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
25 pts

Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.

4 to >3.5 pts

Proficient
Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Basic
Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.
5 pts

Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.

4 to >3.5 pts

Proficient
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Basic
Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.
5 pts

APA Attributions and Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1″ margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting with no errors using the template provided.

4 to >3.5 pts

Proficient
Demonstrates developed APA formatting with few formatting errors in the template provided.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Basic
Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting with several formatting errors in the template provided.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Demonstrates limited APA formatting with multiple formatting errors or fails to use the template provided.
5 pts
Total Points: 100

LEARNING RESOURCES

Scholarly writing is a critical component of nursing academics. Walden University provides resources to support scholarly writing such as the CON Writing Template, Grammarly, access to the Walden Writing Center editing services, and many other tools for success.

Access these supportive resources for successful writing in the Writing Resources link found in the Start Here module.

  • Walden University, LLC. (2015). Quantitative research designs  [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
    Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 27 minutes.
  • Walden University, LLC. (2021). Research methods  [Interactive media]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
  • Fitzpatrick, J. J. (Ed.). (2017). Encyclopedia of nursing research (4th ed.). Springer.

Do you Need a nursing assignment, paper or essay help ?

Get an plagiarism free paper on NURS 3151 / NURS 3150 WEEK 3: Quantitative Research Designs and Methods or any other topic and enjoy top notch delivery with pocket friendly prices

Order a paper