NUR 665 – GCU : WEEK 9 Lesson Evaluation – Reference Map

NUR 665 – GCU : WEEK 9 Lesson Evaluation – Reference Map

Lesson Evaluation

The effective nurse educator employs a variety of formative and summative techniques during curriculum implementation to monitor student learning. A well-developed lesson plan employs both formative and summative assessments. A nurse educator should plan to use data from these assessments to guide instruction.

Concept maps describe the relationships between concepts and allow for an improved understand through critical thinking and analysis. To understand the link between formative and summative assessment strategies, develop a concept map describing the flow of assessment strategies throughout your own lesson plan. Be creative in your design. A rationale should be included for your choice of assessments.

 

ORDER A PAPER FROM OUR A++ WRITERS TODAY !

 

Use the Topic Materials and your own research, to develop your concept map. Include the following criteria to create your concept map for this assignment:

1. Description of one formative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan with rationale.
2. Explanation of how the data from the formative assessment will guide your instruction.
3. Description of one summative assessment strategy to be used in the lesson plan with rationale.
4. Explanation of how the data from the summative assessment will guide your future lesson plan revisions.
5. Description of the instructor satisfaction survey to be administered to students.
6. Explanation of how data from the instructor satisfaction survey will guide your teaching practice.

Cite two or three peer‐reviewed/scholarly resources no more than 5 years old in your paper.

Prepare this assessment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Materials if you need assistance.

RUBRIC

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
NUR-665E	NUR-665E-OL191MN	Lesson Evaluation	25.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)	3: Satisfactory (88.00%)	4: Good (92.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)
Content	100.0%
Formative Assessment Strategy	12.0%	A description of one formative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is not present.	A description of one formative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of one formative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of one formative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of one formative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Formative Assessment Data Use	12.0%	An explanation of how the data from the formative assessment will guide your instruction is not present.	An explanation of how the data from the formative assessment will guide your instruction is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of how the data from the formative assessment will guide your instruction is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of how the data from the formative assessment will guide your instruction is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of how the data from the formative assessment will guide your instruction is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Summative Assessment Strategy	12.0%	A description of one summative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is not present.	A description of one summative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of one summative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of one summative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of one summative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan, with rationale, is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Summative Assessment Data Use	12.0%	An explanation of how the data from the summative assessment will guide your instruction is not present.	An explanation of how the data from the summative assessment will guide your instruction is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of how the data from the summative assessment will guide your instruction is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of how the data from the summative assessment will guide your instruction is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of how the data from the summative assessment will guide your instruction is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Instructor Satisfaction Survey	11.0%	A description of the instructor satisfaction survey to be administered to students is not present.	A description of the instructor satisfaction survey to be administered to students is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the instructor satisfaction survey to be administered to students is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of the instructor satisfaction survey to be administered to students is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the instructor satisfaction survey to be administered to students is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Instructor Satisfaction Survey Data Use	11.0%	An explanation of how data from the instructor satisfaction survey will guide your teaching practice is not present.	An explanation of how data from the instructor satisfaction survey will guide your teaching practice is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of how data from the instructor satisfaction survey will guide your teaching practice is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of how data from the instructor satisfaction survey will guide your teaching practice is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of how data from the instructor satisfaction survey will guide your teaching practice is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

 

Sample Solution 1 to NUR 665 – GCU : WEEK 9 Lesson Evaluation – Reference Map