NURS 3100 Week 4 Discussion , Assignments and Essays

NURS 3100 Issues/Trends in Nursing  Week 4

NURS 3100 Week 4 Discussion

THE ESSENCE OF NURSING

According to Hundt (2020), there is renewed attention on Florence Nightingale in the Year of the Nurse. Nightingale’s 19th century observations that natural light and a view of nature improve hospitalized patients’ recovery has been validated in randomized-controlled trials. Currently, there are interdisciplinary teams that include nurses and architects, that design optimal healing environments with a focus on patient-centered care.

Delivering the kind of care that Florence Nightingale practiced hinges on nurses fully utilizing their education and training and on their taking the lead to improve health care safety and quality and patient outcomes (National Academy of Medicine [NAM], 2020). Think about how you incorporate science into your everyday practice. Right now, for example, you may use your understanding of pharmacotherapy when safely administering medications. In the future, do you see yourself applying your research expertise by collecting or using clinical data to improve patient outcomes at your place of work or in the larger community?

Reference

Hundt, B. (2020). Reflections on Nightingale in the year of the nurse. American Nurse Journal. https://www.myamericannurse.com/reflections-on-nightingale-in-the-year-of-the-nurse/

 

ORDER A NURS 3100 Week 4 Discussion Or Assignment  Today !!

Get a custom written, paper or essay just for you in as little as 3hrs.

Our Qualified A++ writers are always online to assist you.

 

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

 

To prepare

  • Review the articles and media from this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Review the Week 4 Discussion Rubric.
  • Review the Writing Resources tab in the Start Here module.

BY DAY 3

Post a 3-paragraph response (of at least 350 words) to the following:

According to Ma, Shang, & Bott (2015), it is critical that contemporary nurses have strong leadership and collaboration skills to improve health care.

  • Reflect on and describe the expertise that you expect to acquire with your education at Walden.
  • Envision yourself taking the lead to improve patient quality and safety in your practice setting and describe what that might look like. Describe the knowledge and skills needed to achieve your professional goals.

 

BY DAY 7

Read two or more of your colleagues’ postings from the Discussion question.

Respond with a comment that asks for clarification, provides support for, or contributes additional information to two or more of your colleagues.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting and continue the Discussion for the remainder of the week. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your classmates made.

 

ORDER A NURS 3100 Week 4 Discussion Or Assignment  Today !!

 

NURS 3100 Week 4 Assignment

Rubric

NURS_3100_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_3100_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Required Content Begin by describing the nurse-led improvement or research project found in the article. Include a short description of the purpose, method, and outcomes.

39 to >34.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed description of the nurse-led improvement or research project found in the article including the purpose, method, and outcomes.

34 to >30.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed description of the nurse-led improvement or research project found in the article including the purpose, method, and outcomes.

30 to >26.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed description of the nurse-led improvement or research project found in the article including the purpose, method, and outcomes.

26 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed description of the nurse-led improvement or research project found in the article including the purpose, method, and outcomes.
39 pts

Evaluate how this project has the potential to improve quality and safety for patients.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed evaluation of how this project has the potential to improve quality and safety for patients.

35 to >31.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed evaluation of how this project has the potential to improve quality and safety for patients.

31 to >27.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed evaluation of how this project has the potential to improve quality and safety for patients.

27 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed evaluation of how this project has the potential to improve quality and safety for patients.
40 pts

What are at least two insights you gained from this project that enhance your personal professional goals?

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided a fully developed description of at least two insights you gained from this project that enhanced your personal professional goals.

35 to >31.0 pts

Proficient
Student provided a developed description of at least two insights you gained from this project that enhanced your personal professional goals.

31 to >27.0 pts

Basic
Student provided a minimally developed description of at least two insights you gained from this project that enhanced your personal professional goals.

27 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed description of at least two insights you gained from this project that enhanced your personal professional goals.
40 pts

Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization

17 to >15.0 pts

Excellent
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.

15 to >13.0 pts

Proficient
Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.

13 to >11.0 pts

Basic
Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.

11 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.
17 pts

Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone

17 to >15.0 pts

Excellent
Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.

15 to >13.0 pts

Proficient
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

13 to >11.0 pts

Basic
Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

11 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.
17 pts

Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas

17 to >15.0 pts

Excellent
Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.

15 to >13.0 pts

Proficient
Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor errors.

13 to >11.0 pts

Basic
Content somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are two or three minor errors.

11 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement
Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference. There are numerous and/or significant errors.
17 pts
Total Points: 170

See Also :

NURS 3100 Week 3 Discussion & Assignments 2022

Do you Need a nursing assignment, paper or essay help ?

Get an plagiarism free paper on NURS 3100 Week 4 Discussion , Assignments and Essays or any other topic and enjoy top notch delivery with pocket friendly prices

Order a paper